
The version of Test::More available in CentOS/RHEL 6 doesn't include `subtest`, which we want to use. We can revert this commit once we drop support for CentOS/RHEL 6. The code is licensed under the same terms as Perl 5 itself: https://github.com/Test-More/test-more/blob/v1.302175/LICENSE
1997 lines
52 KiB
Perl
1997 lines
52 KiB
Perl
package Test::More;
|
|
|
|
use 5.006;
|
|
use strict;
|
|
use warnings;
|
|
|
|
#---- perlcritic exemptions. ----#
|
|
|
|
# We use a lot of subroutine prototypes
|
|
## no critic (Subroutines::ProhibitSubroutinePrototypes)
|
|
|
|
# Can't use Carp because it might cause C<use_ok()> to accidentally succeed
|
|
# even though the module being used forgot to use Carp. Yes, this
|
|
# actually happened.
|
|
sub _carp {
|
|
my( $file, $line ) = ( caller(1) )[ 1, 2 ];
|
|
return warn @_, " at $file line $line\n";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
our $VERSION = '1.302175';
|
|
|
|
use Test::Builder::Module;
|
|
our @ISA = qw(Test::Builder::Module);
|
|
our @EXPORT = qw(ok use_ok require_ok
|
|
is isnt like unlike is_deeply
|
|
cmp_ok
|
|
skip todo todo_skip
|
|
pass fail
|
|
eq_array eq_hash eq_set
|
|
$TODO
|
|
plan
|
|
done_testing
|
|
can_ok isa_ok new_ok
|
|
diag note explain
|
|
subtest
|
|
BAIL_OUT
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
=head1 NAME
|
|
|
|
Test::More - yet another framework for writing test scripts
|
|
|
|
=head1 SYNOPSIS
|
|
|
|
use Test::More tests => 23;
|
|
# or
|
|
use Test::More skip_all => $reason;
|
|
# or
|
|
use Test::More; # see done_testing()
|
|
|
|
require_ok( 'Some::Module' );
|
|
|
|
# Various ways to say "ok"
|
|
ok($got eq $expected, $test_name);
|
|
|
|
is ($got, $expected, $test_name);
|
|
isnt($got, $expected, $test_name);
|
|
|
|
# Rather than print STDERR "# here's what went wrong\n"
|
|
diag("here's what went wrong");
|
|
|
|
like ($got, qr/expected/, $test_name);
|
|
unlike($got, qr/expected/, $test_name);
|
|
|
|
cmp_ok($got, '==', $expected, $test_name);
|
|
|
|
is_deeply($got_complex_structure, $expected_complex_structure, $test_name);
|
|
|
|
SKIP: {
|
|
skip $why, $how_many unless $have_some_feature;
|
|
|
|
ok( foo(), $test_name );
|
|
is( foo(42), 23, $test_name );
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
TODO: {
|
|
local $TODO = $why;
|
|
|
|
ok( foo(), $test_name );
|
|
is( foo(42), 23, $test_name );
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
can_ok($module, @methods);
|
|
isa_ok($object, $class);
|
|
|
|
pass($test_name);
|
|
fail($test_name);
|
|
|
|
BAIL_OUT($why);
|
|
|
|
# UNIMPLEMENTED!!!
|
|
my @status = Test::More::status;
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
B<STOP!> If you're just getting started writing tests, have a look at
|
|
L<Test2::Suite> first.
|
|
|
|
This is a drop in replacement for Test::Simple which you can switch to once you
|
|
get the hang of basic testing.
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this module is to provide a wide range of testing
|
|
utilities. Various ways to say "ok" with better diagnostics,
|
|
facilities to skip tests, test future features and compare complicated
|
|
data structures. While you can do almost anything with a simple
|
|
C<ok()> function, it doesn't provide good diagnostic output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head2 I love it when a plan comes together
|
|
|
|
Before anything else, you need a testing plan. This basically declares
|
|
how many tests your script is going to run to protect against premature
|
|
failure.
|
|
|
|
The preferred way to do this is to declare a plan when you C<use Test::More>.
|
|
|
|
use Test::More tests => 23;
|
|
|
|
There are cases when you will not know beforehand how many tests your
|
|
script is going to run. In this case, you can declare your tests at
|
|
the end.
|
|
|
|
use Test::More;
|
|
|
|
... run your tests ...
|
|
|
|
done_testing( $number_of_tests_run );
|
|
|
|
B<NOTE> C<done_testing()> should never be called in an C<END { ... }> block.
|
|
|
|
Sometimes you really don't know how many tests were run, or it's too
|
|
difficult to calculate. In which case you can leave off
|
|
$number_of_tests_run.
|
|
|
|
In some cases, you'll want to completely skip an entire testing script.
|
|
|
|
use Test::More skip_all => $skip_reason;
|
|
|
|
Your script will declare a skip with the reason why you skipped and
|
|
exit immediately with a zero (success). See L<Test::Harness> for
|
|
details.
|
|
|
|
If you want to control what functions Test::More will export, you
|
|
have to use the 'import' option. For example, to import everything
|
|
but 'fail', you'd do:
|
|
|
|
use Test::More tests => 23, import => ['!fail'];
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you can use the C<plan()> function. Useful for when you
|
|
have to calculate the number of tests.
|
|
|
|
use Test::More;
|
|
plan tests => keys %Stuff * 3;
|
|
|
|
or for deciding between running the tests at all:
|
|
|
|
use Test::More;
|
|
if( $^O eq 'MacOS' ) {
|
|
plan skip_all => 'Test irrelevant on MacOS';
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
plan tests => 42;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub plan {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
return $tb->plan(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# This implements "use Test::More 'no_diag'" but the behavior is
|
|
# deprecated.
|
|
sub import_extra {
|
|
my $class = shift;
|
|
my $list = shift;
|
|
|
|
my @other = ();
|
|
my $idx = 0;
|
|
my $import;
|
|
while( $idx <= $#{$list} ) {
|
|
my $item = $list->[$idx];
|
|
|
|
if( defined $item and $item eq 'no_diag' ) {
|
|
$class->builder->no_diag(1);
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( defined $item and $item eq 'import' ) {
|
|
if ($import) {
|
|
push @$import, @{$list->[ ++$idx ]};
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
$import = $list->[ ++$idx ];
|
|
push @other, $item, $import;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
push @other, $item;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
$idx++;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@$list = @other;
|
|
|
|
if ($class eq __PACKAGE__ && (!$import || grep $_ eq '$TODO', @$import)) {
|
|
my $to = $class->builder->exported_to;
|
|
no strict 'refs';
|
|
*{"$to\::TODO"} = \our $TODO;
|
|
if ($import) {
|
|
@$import = grep $_ ne '$TODO', @$import;
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
push @$list, import => [grep $_ ne '$TODO', @EXPORT];
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item B<done_testing>
|
|
|
|
done_testing();
|
|
done_testing($number_of_tests);
|
|
|
|
If you don't know how many tests you're going to run, you can issue
|
|
the plan when you're done running tests.
|
|
|
|
$number_of_tests is the same as C<plan()>, it's the number of tests you
|
|
expected to run. You can omit this, in which case the number of tests
|
|
you ran doesn't matter, just the fact that your tests ran to
|
|
conclusion.
|
|
|
|
This is safer than and replaces the "no_plan" plan.
|
|
|
|
B<Note:> You must never put C<done_testing()> inside an C<END { ... }> block.
|
|
The plan is there to ensure your test does not exit before testing has
|
|
completed. If you use an END block you completely bypass this protection.
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub done_testing {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
$tb->done_testing(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=head2 Test names
|
|
|
|
By convention, each test is assigned a number in order. This is
|
|
largely done automatically for you. However, it's often very useful to
|
|
assign a name to each test. Which would you rather see:
|
|
|
|
ok 4
|
|
not ok 5
|
|
ok 6
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
ok 4 - basic multi-variable
|
|
not ok 5 - simple exponential
|
|
ok 6 - force == mass * acceleration
|
|
|
|
The later gives you some idea of what failed. It also makes it easier
|
|
to find the test in your script, simply search for "simple
|
|
exponential".
|
|
|
|
All test functions take a name argument. It's optional, but highly
|
|
suggested that you use it.
|
|
|
|
=head2 I'm ok, you're not ok.
|
|
|
|
The basic purpose of this module is to print out either "ok #" or "not
|
|
ok #" depending on if a given test succeeded or failed. Everything
|
|
else is just gravy.
|
|
|
|
All of the following print "ok" or "not ok" depending on if the test
|
|
succeeded or failed. They all also return true or false,
|
|
respectively.
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item B<ok>
|
|
|
|
ok($got eq $expected, $test_name);
|
|
|
|
This simply evaluates any expression (C<$got eq $expected> is just a
|
|
simple example) and uses that to determine if the test succeeded or
|
|
failed. A true expression passes, a false one fails. Very simple.
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
ok( $exp{9} == 81, 'simple exponential' );
|
|
ok( Film->can('db_Main'), 'set_db()' );
|
|
ok( $p->tests == 4, 'saw tests' );
|
|
ok( !grep(!defined $_, @items), 'all items defined' );
|
|
|
|
(Mnemonic: "This is ok.")
|
|
|
|
$test_name is a very short description of the test that will be printed
|
|
out. It makes it very easy to find a test in your script when it fails
|
|
and gives others an idea of your intentions. $test_name is optional,
|
|
but we B<very> strongly encourage its use.
|
|
|
|
Should an C<ok()> fail, it will produce some diagnostics:
|
|
|
|
not ok 18 - sufficient mucus
|
|
# Failed test 'sufficient mucus'
|
|
# in foo.t at line 42.
|
|
|
|
This is the same as L<Test::Simple>'s C<ok()> routine.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub ok ($;$) {
|
|
my( $test, $name ) = @_;
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
return $tb->ok( $test, $name );
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<is>
|
|
|
|
=item B<isnt>
|
|
|
|
is ( $got, $expected, $test_name );
|
|
isnt( $got, $expected, $test_name );
|
|
|
|
Similar to C<ok()>, C<is()> and C<isnt()> compare their two arguments
|
|
with C<eq> and C<ne> respectively and use the result of that to
|
|
determine if the test succeeded or failed. So these:
|
|
|
|
# Is the ultimate answer 42?
|
|
is( ultimate_answer(), 42, "Meaning of Life" );
|
|
|
|
# $foo isn't empty
|
|
isnt( $foo, '', "Got some foo" );
|
|
|
|
are similar to these:
|
|
|
|
ok( ultimate_answer() eq 42, "Meaning of Life" );
|
|
ok( $foo ne '', "Got some foo" );
|
|
|
|
C<undef> will only ever match C<undef>. So you can test a value
|
|
against C<undef> like this:
|
|
|
|
is($not_defined, undef, "undefined as expected");
|
|
|
|
(Mnemonic: "This is that." "This isn't that.")
|
|
|
|
So why use these? They produce better diagnostics on failure. C<ok()>
|
|
cannot know what you are testing for (beyond the name), but C<is()> and
|
|
C<isnt()> know what the test was and why it failed. For example this
|
|
test:
|
|
|
|
my $foo = 'waffle'; my $bar = 'yarblokos';
|
|
is( $foo, $bar, 'Is foo the same as bar?' );
|
|
|
|
Will produce something like this:
|
|
|
|
not ok 17 - Is foo the same as bar?
|
|
# Failed test 'Is foo the same as bar?'
|
|
# in foo.t at line 139.
|
|
# got: 'waffle'
|
|
# expected: 'yarblokos'
|
|
|
|
So you can figure out what went wrong without rerunning the test.
|
|
|
|
You are encouraged to use C<is()> and C<isnt()> over C<ok()> where possible,
|
|
however do not be tempted to use them to find out if something is
|
|
true or false!
|
|
|
|
# XXX BAD!
|
|
is( exists $brooklyn{tree}, 1, 'A tree grows in Brooklyn' );
|
|
|
|
This does not check if C<exists $brooklyn{tree}> is true, it checks if
|
|
it returns 1. Very different. Similar caveats exist for false and 0.
|
|
In these cases, use C<ok()>.
|
|
|
|
ok( exists $brooklyn{tree}, 'A tree grows in Brooklyn' );
|
|
|
|
A simple call to C<isnt()> usually does not provide a strong test but there
|
|
are cases when you cannot say much more about a value than that it is
|
|
different from some other value:
|
|
|
|
new_ok $obj, "Foo";
|
|
|
|
my $clone = $obj->clone;
|
|
isa_ok $obj, "Foo", "Foo->clone";
|
|
|
|
isnt $obj, $clone, "clone() produces a different object";
|
|
|
|
For those grammatical pedants out there, there's an C<isn't()>
|
|
function which is an alias of C<isnt()>.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub is ($$;$) {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
return $tb->is_eq(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub isnt ($$;$) {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
return $tb->isnt_eq(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
*isn't = \&isnt;
|
|
# ' to unconfuse syntax higlighters
|
|
|
|
=item B<like>
|
|
|
|
like( $got, qr/expected/, $test_name );
|
|
|
|
Similar to C<ok()>, C<like()> matches $got against the regex C<qr/expected/>.
|
|
|
|
So this:
|
|
|
|
like($got, qr/expected/, 'this is like that');
|
|
|
|
is similar to:
|
|
|
|
ok( $got =~ m/expected/, 'this is like that');
|
|
|
|
(Mnemonic "This is like that".)
|
|
|
|
The second argument is a regular expression. It may be given as a
|
|
regex reference (i.e. C<qr//>) or (for better compatibility with older
|
|
perls) as a string that looks like a regex (alternative delimiters are
|
|
currently not supported):
|
|
|
|
like( $got, '/expected/', 'this is like that' );
|
|
|
|
Regex options may be placed on the end (C<'/expected/i'>).
|
|
|
|
Its advantages over C<ok()> are similar to that of C<is()> and C<isnt()>. Better
|
|
diagnostics on failure.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub like ($$;$) {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
return $tb->like(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<unlike>
|
|
|
|
unlike( $got, qr/expected/, $test_name );
|
|
|
|
Works exactly as C<like()>, only it checks if $got B<does not> match the
|
|
given pattern.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub unlike ($$;$) {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
return $tb->unlike(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<cmp_ok>
|
|
|
|
cmp_ok( $got, $op, $expected, $test_name );
|
|
|
|
Halfway between C<ok()> and C<is()> lies C<cmp_ok()>. This allows you
|
|
to compare two arguments using any binary perl operator. The test
|
|
passes if the comparison is true and fails otherwise.
|
|
|
|
# ok( $got eq $expected );
|
|
cmp_ok( $got, 'eq', $expected, 'this eq that' );
|
|
|
|
# ok( $got == $expected );
|
|
cmp_ok( $got, '==', $expected, 'this == that' );
|
|
|
|
# ok( $got && $expected );
|
|
cmp_ok( $got, '&&', $expected, 'this && that' );
|
|
...etc...
|
|
|
|
Its advantage over C<ok()> is when the test fails you'll know what $got
|
|
and $expected were:
|
|
|
|
not ok 1
|
|
# Failed test in foo.t at line 12.
|
|
# '23'
|
|
# &&
|
|
# undef
|
|
|
|
It's also useful in those cases where you are comparing numbers and
|
|
C<is()>'s use of C<eq> will interfere:
|
|
|
|
cmp_ok( $big_hairy_number, '==', $another_big_hairy_number );
|
|
|
|
It's especially useful when comparing greater-than or smaller-than
|
|
relation between values:
|
|
|
|
cmp_ok( $some_value, '<=', $upper_limit );
|
|
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub cmp_ok($$$;$) {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
return $tb->cmp_ok(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<can_ok>
|
|
|
|
can_ok($module, @methods);
|
|
can_ok($object, @methods);
|
|
|
|
Checks to make sure the $module or $object can do these @methods
|
|
(works with functions, too).
|
|
|
|
can_ok('Foo', qw(this that whatever));
|
|
|
|
is almost exactly like saying:
|
|
|
|
ok( Foo->can('this') &&
|
|
Foo->can('that') &&
|
|
Foo->can('whatever')
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
only without all the typing and with a better interface. Handy for
|
|
quickly testing an interface.
|
|
|
|
No matter how many @methods you check, a single C<can_ok()> call counts
|
|
as one test. If you desire otherwise, use:
|
|
|
|
foreach my $meth (@methods) {
|
|
can_ok('Foo', $meth);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub can_ok ($@) {
|
|
my( $proto, @methods ) = @_;
|
|
my $class = ref $proto || $proto;
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
unless($class) {
|
|
my $ok = $tb->ok( 0, "->can(...)" );
|
|
$tb->diag(' can_ok() called with empty class or reference');
|
|
return $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
unless(@methods) {
|
|
my $ok = $tb->ok( 0, "$class->can(...)" );
|
|
$tb->diag(' can_ok() called with no methods');
|
|
return $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
my @nok = ();
|
|
foreach my $method (@methods) {
|
|
$tb->_try( sub { $proto->can($method) } ) or push @nok, $method;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
my $name = (@methods == 1) ? "$class->can('$methods[0]')" :
|
|
"$class->can(...)" ;
|
|
|
|
my $ok = $tb->ok( !@nok, $name );
|
|
|
|
$tb->diag( map " $class->can('$_') failed\n", @nok );
|
|
|
|
return $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<isa_ok>
|
|
|
|
isa_ok($object, $class, $object_name);
|
|
isa_ok($subclass, $class, $object_name);
|
|
isa_ok($ref, $type, $ref_name);
|
|
|
|
Checks to see if the given C<< $object->isa($class) >>. Also checks to make
|
|
sure the object was defined in the first place. Handy for this sort
|
|
of thing:
|
|
|
|
my $obj = Some::Module->new;
|
|
isa_ok( $obj, 'Some::Module' );
|
|
|
|
where you'd otherwise have to write
|
|
|
|
my $obj = Some::Module->new;
|
|
ok( defined $obj && $obj->isa('Some::Module') );
|
|
|
|
to safeguard against your test script blowing up.
|
|
|
|
You can also test a class, to make sure that it has the right ancestor:
|
|
|
|
isa_ok( 'Vole', 'Rodent' );
|
|
|
|
It works on references, too:
|
|
|
|
isa_ok( $array_ref, 'ARRAY' );
|
|
|
|
The diagnostics of this test normally just refer to 'the object'. If
|
|
you'd like them to be more specific, you can supply an $object_name
|
|
(for example 'Test customer').
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub isa_ok ($$;$) {
|
|
my( $thing, $class, $thing_name ) = @_;
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
my $whatami;
|
|
if( !defined $thing ) {
|
|
$whatami = 'undef';
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( ref $thing ) {
|
|
$whatami = 'reference';
|
|
|
|
local($@,$!);
|
|
require Scalar::Util;
|
|
if( Scalar::Util::blessed($thing) ) {
|
|
$whatami = 'object';
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
$whatami = 'class';
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# We can't use UNIVERSAL::isa because we want to honor isa() overrides
|
|
my( $rslt, $error ) = $tb->_try( sub { $thing->isa($class) } );
|
|
|
|
if($error) {
|
|
die <<WHOA unless $error =~ /^Can't (locate|call) method "isa"/;
|
|
WHOA! I tried to call ->isa on your $whatami and got some weird error.
|
|
Here's the error.
|
|
$error
|
|
WHOA
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# Special case for isa_ok( [], "ARRAY" ) and like
|
|
if( $whatami eq 'reference' ) {
|
|
$rslt = UNIVERSAL::isa($thing, $class);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
my($diag, $name);
|
|
if( defined $thing_name ) {
|
|
$name = "'$thing_name' isa '$class'";
|
|
$diag = defined $thing ? "'$thing_name' isn't a '$class'" : "'$thing_name' isn't defined";
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( $whatami eq 'object' ) {
|
|
my $my_class = ref $thing;
|
|
$thing_name = qq[An object of class '$my_class'];
|
|
$name = "$thing_name isa '$class'";
|
|
$diag = "The object of class '$my_class' isn't a '$class'";
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( $whatami eq 'reference' ) {
|
|
my $type = ref $thing;
|
|
$thing_name = qq[A reference of type '$type'];
|
|
$name = "$thing_name isa '$class'";
|
|
$diag = "The reference of type '$type' isn't a '$class'";
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( $whatami eq 'undef' ) {
|
|
$thing_name = 'undef';
|
|
$name = "$thing_name isa '$class'";
|
|
$diag = "$thing_name isn't defined";
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( $whatami eq 'class' ) {
|
|
$thing_name = qq[The class (or class-like) '$thing'];
|
|
$name = "$thing_name isa '$class'";
|
|
$diag = "$thing_name isn't a '$class'";
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
die;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
my $ok;
|
|
if($rslt) {
|
|
$ok = $tb->ok( 1, $name );
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
$ok = $tb->ok( 0, $name );
|
|
$tb->diag(" $diag\n");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<new_ok>
|
|
|
|
my $obj = new_ok( $class );
|
|
my $obj = new_ok( $class => \@args );
|
|
my $obj = new_ok( $class => \@args, $object_name );
|
|
|
|
A convenience function which combines creating an object and calling
|
|
C<isa_ok()> on that object.
|
|
|
|
It is basically equivalent to:
|
|
|
|
my $obj = $class->new(@args);
|
|
isa_ok $obj, $class, $object_name;
|
|
|
|
If @args is not given, an empty list will be used.
|
|
|
|
This function only works on C<new()> and it assumes C<new()> will return
|
|
just a single object which isa C<$class>.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub new_ok {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
$tb->croak("new_ok() must be given at least a class") unless @_;
|
|
|
|
my( $class, $args, $object_name ) = @_;
|
|
|
|
$args ||= [];
|
|
|
|
my $obj;
|
|
my( $success, $error ) = $tb->_try( sub { $obj = $class->new(@$args); 1 } );
|
|
if($success) {
|
|
local $Test::Builder::Level = $Test::Builder::Level + 1;
|
|
isa_ok $obj, $class, $object_name;
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
$class = 'undef' if !defined $class;
|
|
$tb->ok( 0, "$class->new() died" );
|
|
$tb->diag(" Error was: $error");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return $obj;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<subtest>
|
|
|
|
subtest $name => \&code, @args;
|
|
|
|
C<subtest()> runs the &code as its own little test with its own plan and
|
|
its own result. The main test counts this as a single test using the
|
|
result of the whole subtest to determine if its ok or not ok.
|
|
|
|
For example...
|
|
|
|
use Test::More tests => 3;
|
|
|
|
pass("First test");
|
|
|
|
subtest 'An example subtest' => sub {
|
|
plan tests => 2;
|
|
|
|
pass("This is a subtest");
|
|
pass("So is this");
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
pass("Third test");
|
|
|
|
This would produce.
|
|
|
|
1..3
|
|
ok 1 - First test
|
|
# Subtest: An example subtest
|
|
1..2
|
|
ok 1 - This is a subtest
|
|
ok 2 - So is this
|
|
ok 2 - An example subtest
|
|
ok 3 - Third test
|
|
|
|
A subtest may call C<skip_all>. No tests will be run, but the subtest is
|
|
considered a skip.
|
|
|
|
subtest 'skippy' => sub {
|
|
plan skip_all => 'cuz I said so';
|
|
pass('this test will never be run');
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
Returns true if the subtest passed, false otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Due to how subtests work, you may omit a plan if you desire. This adds an
|
|
implicit C<done_testing()> to the end of your subtest. The following two
|
|
subtests are equivalent:
|
|
|
|
subtest 'subtest with implicit done_testing()', sub {
|
|
ok 1, 'subtests with an implicit done testing should work';
|
|
ok 1, '... and support more than one test';
|
|
ok 1, '... no matter how many tests are run';
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
subtest 'subtest with explicit done_testing()', sub {
|
|
ok 1, 'subtests with an explicit done testing should work';
|
|
ok 1, '... and support more than one test';
|
|
ok 1, '... no matter how many tests are run';
|
|
done_testing();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
Extra arguments given to C<subtest> are passed to the callback. For example:
|
|
|
|
sub my_subtest {
|
|
my $range = shift;
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for my $range (1, 10, 100, 1000) {
|
|
subtest "testing range $range", \&my_subtest, $range;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub subtest {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
return $tb->subtest(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<pass>
|
|
|
|
=item B<fail>
|
|
|
|
pass($test_name);
|
|
fail($test_name);
|
|
|
|
Sometimes you just want to say that the tests have passed. Usually
|
|
the case is you've got some complicated condition that is difficult to
|
|
wedge into an C<ok()>. In this case, you can simply use C<pass()> (to
|
|
declare the test ok) or fail (for not ok). They are synonyms for
|
|
C<ok(1)> and C<ok(0)>.
|
|
|
|
Use these very, very, very sparingly.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub pass (;$) {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
return $tb->ok( 1, @_ );
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub fail (;$) {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
return $tb->ok( 0, @_ );
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head2 Module tests
|
|
|
|
Sometimes you want to test if a module, or a list of modules, can
|
|
successfully load. For example, you'll often want a first test which
|
|
simply loads all the modules in the distribution to make sure they
|
|
work before going on to do more complicated testing.
|
|
|
|
For such purposes we have C<use_ok> and C<require_ok>.
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item B<require_ok>
|
|
|
|
require_ok($module);
|
|
require_ok($file);
|
|
|
|
Tries to C<require> the given $module or $file. If it loads
|
|
successfully, the test will pass. Otherwise it fails and displays the
|
|
load error.
|
|
|
|
C<require_ok> will guess whether the input is a module name or a
|
|
filename.
|
|
|
|
No exception will be thrown if the load fails.
|
|
|
|
# require Some::Module
|
|
require_ok "Some::Module";
|
|
|
|
# require "Some/File.pl";
|
|
require_ok "Some/File.pl";
|
|
|
|
# stop testing if any of your modules will not load
|
|
for my $module (@module) {
|
|
require_ok $module or BAIL_OUT "Can't load $module";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub require_ok ($) {
|
|
my($module) = shift;
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
my $pack = caller;
|
|
|
|
# Try to determine if we've been given a module name or file.
|
|
# Module names must be barewords, files not.
|
|
$module = qq['$module'] unless _is_module_name($module);
|
|
|
|
my $code = <<REQUIRE;
|
|
package $pack;
|
|
require $module;
|
|
1;
|
|
REQUIRE
|
|
|
|
my( $eval_result, $eval_error ) = _eval($code);
|
|
my $ok = $tb->ok( $eval_result, "require $module;" );
|
|
|
|
unless($ok) {
|
|
chomp $eval_error;
|
|
$tb->diag(<<DIAGNOSTIC);
|
|
Tried to require '$module'.
|
|
Error: $eval_error
|
|
DIAGNOSTIC
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub _is_module_name {
|
|
my $module = shift;
|
|
|
|
# Module names start with a letter.
|
|
# End with an alphanumeric.
|
|
# The rest is an alphanumeric or ::
|
|
$module =~ s/\b::\b//g;
|
|
|
|
return $module =~ /^[a-zA-Z]\w*$/ ? 1 : 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item B<use_ok>
|
|
|
|
BEGIN { use_ok($module); }
|
|
BEGIN { use_ok($module, @imports); }
|
|
|
|
Like C<require_ok>, but it will C<use> the $module in question and
|
|
only loads modules, not files.
|
|
|
|
If you just want to test a module can be loaded, use C<require_ok>.
|
|
|
|
If you just want to load a module in a test, we recommend simply using
|
|
C<use> directly. It will cause the test to stop.
|
|
|
|
It's recommended that you run C<use_ok()> inside a BEGIN block so its
|
|
functions are exported at compile-time and prototypes are properly
|
|
honored.
|
|
|
|
If @imports are given, they are passed through to the use. So this:
|
|
|
|
BEGIN { use_ok('Some::Module', qw(foo bar)) }
|
|
|
|
is like doing this:
|
|
|
|
use Some::Module qw(foo bar);
|
|
|
|
Version numbers can be checked like so:
|
|
|
|
# Just like "use Some::Module 1.02"
|
|
BEGIN { use_ok('Some::Module', 1.02) }
|
|
|
|
Don't try to do this:
|
|
|
|
BEGIN {
|
|
use_ok('Some::Module');
|
|
|
|
...some code that depends on the use...
|
|
...happening at compile time...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
because the notion of "compile-time" is relative. Instead, you want:
|
|
|
|
BEGIN { use_ok('Some::Module') }
|
|
BEGIN { ...some code that depends on the use... }
|
|
|
|
If you want the equivalent of C<use Foo ()>, use a module but not
|
|
import anything, use C<require_ok>.
|
|
|
|
BEGIN { require_ok "Foo" }
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub use_ok ($;@) {
|
|
my( $module, @imports ) = @_;
|
|
@imports = () unless @imports;
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
my %caller;
|
|
@caller{qw/pack file line sub args want eval req strict warn/} = caller(0);
|
|
|
|
my ($pack, $filename, $line, $warn) = @caller{qw/pack file line warn/};
|
|
$filename =~ y/\n\r/_/; # so it doesn't run off the "#line $line $f" line
|
|
|
|
my $code;
|
|
if( @imports == 1 and $imports[0] =~ /^\d+(?:\.\d+)?$/ ) {
|
|
# probably a version check. Perl needs to see the bare number
|
|
# for it to work with non-Exporter based modules.
|
|
$code = <<USE;
|
|
package $pack;
|
|
BEGIN { \${^WARNING_BITS} = \$args[-1] if defined \$args[-1] }
|
|
#line $line $filename
|
|
use $module $imports[0];
|
|
1;
|
|
USE
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
$code = <<USE;
|
|
package $pack;
|
|
BEGIN { \${^WARNING_BITS} = \$args[-1] if defined \$args[-1] }
|
|
#line $line $filename
|
|
use $module \@{\$args[0]};
|
|
1;
|
|
USE
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
my ($eval_result, $eval_error) = _eval($code, \@imports, $warn);
|
|
my $ok = $tb->ok( $eval_result, "use $module;" );
|
|
|
|
unless($ok) {
|
|
chomp $eval_error;
|
|
$@ =~ s{^BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at .*$}
|
|
{BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at $filename line $line.}m;
|
|
$tb->diag(<<DIAGNOSTIC);
|
|
Tried to use '$module'.
|
|
Error: $eval_error
|
|
DIAGNOSTIC
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub _eval {
|
|
my( $code, @args ) = @_;
|
|
|
|
# Work around oddities surrounding resetting of $@ by immediately
|
|
# storing it.
|
|
my( $sigdie, $eval_result, $eval_error );
|
|
{
|
|
local( $@, $!, $SIG{__DIE__} ); # isolate eval
|
|
$eval_result = eval $code; ## no critic (BuiltinFunctions::ProhibitStringyEval)
|
|
$eval_error = $@;
|
|
$sigdie = $SIG{__DIE__} || undef;
|
|
}
|
|
# make sure that $code got a chance to set $SIG{__DIE__}
|
|
$SIG{__DIE__} = $sigdie if defined $sigdie;
|
|
|
|
return( $eval_result, $eval_error );
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head2 Complex data structures
|
|
|
|
Not everything is a simple eq check or regex. There are times you
|
|
need to see if two data structures are equivalent. For these
|
|
instances Test::More provides a handful of useful functions.
|
|
|
|
B<NOTE> I'm not quite sure what will happen with filehandles.
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item B<is_deeply>
|
|
|
|
is_deeply( $got, $expected, $test_name );
|
|
|
|
Similar to C<is()>, except that if $got and $expected are references, it
|
|
does a deep comparison walking each data structure to see if they are
|
|
equivalent. If the two structures are different, it will display the
|
|
place where they start differing.
|
|
|
|
C<is_deeply()> compares the dereferenced values of references, the
|
|
references themselves (except for their type) are ignored. This means
|
|
aspects such as blessing and ties are not considered "different".
|
|
|
|
C<is_deeply()> currently has very limited handling of function reference
|
|
and globs. It merely checks if they have the same referent. This may
|
|
improve in the future.
|
|
|
|
L<Test::Differences> and L<Test::Deep> provide more in-depth functionality
|
|
along these lines.
|
|
|
|
B<NOTE> is_deeply() has limitations when it comes to comparing strings and
|
|
refs:
|
|
|
|
my $path = path('.');
|
|
my $hash = {};
|
|
is_deeply( $path, "$path" ); # ok
|
|
is_deeply( $hash, "$hash" ); # fail
|
|
|
|
This happens because is_deeply will unoverload all arguments unconditionally.
|
|
It is probably best not to use is_deeply with overloading. For legacy reasons
|
|
this is not likely to ever be fixed. If you would like a much better tool for
|
|
this you should see L<Test2::Suite> Specifically L<Test2::Tools::Compare> has
|
|
an C<is()> function that works like C<is_deeply> with many improvements.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
our( @Data_Stack, %Refs_Seen );
|
|
my $DNE = bless [], 'Does::Not::Exist';
|
|
|
|
sub _dne {
|
|
return ref $_[0] eq ref $DNE;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
## no critic (Subroutines::RequireArgUnpacking)
|
|
sub is_deeply {
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
unless( @_ == 2 or @_ == 3 ) {
|
|
my $msg = <<'WARNING';
|
|
is_deeply() takes two or three args, you gave %d.
|
|
This usually means you passed an array or hash instead
|
|
of a reference to it
|
|
WARNING
|
|
chop $msg; # clip off newline so carp() will put in line/file
|
|
|
|
_carp sprintf $msg, scalar @_;
|
|
|
|
return $tb->ok(0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
my( $got, $expected, $name ) = @_;
|
|
|
|
$tb->_unoverload_str( \$expected, \$got );
|
|
|
|
my $ok;
|
|
if( !ref $got and !ref $expected ) { # neither is a reference
|
|
$ok = $tb->is_eq( $got, $expected, $name );
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( !ref $got xor !ref $expected ) { # one's a reference, one isn't
|
|
$ok = $tb->ok( 0, $name );
|
|
$tb->diag( _format_stack({ vals => [ $got, $expected ] }) );
|
|
}
|
|
else { # both references
|
|
local @Data_Stack = ();
|
|
if( _deep_check( $got, $expected ) ) {
|
|
$ok = $tb->ok( 1, $name );
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
$ok = $tb->ok( 0, $name );
|
|
$tb->diag( _format_stack(@Data_Stack) );
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub _format_stack {
|
|
my(@Stack) = @_;
|
|
|
|
my $var = '$FOO';
|
|
my $did_arrow = 0;
|
|
foreach my $entry (@Stack) {
|
|
my $type = $entry->{type} || '';
|
|
my $idx = $entry->{'idx'};
|
|
if( $type eq 'HASH' ) {
|
|
$var .= "->" unless $did_arrow++;
|
|
$var .= "{$idx}";
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( $type eq 'ARRAY' ) {
|
|
$var .= "->" unless $did_arrow++;
|
|
$var .= "[$idx]";
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( $type eq 'REF' ) {
|
|
$var = "\${$var}";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
my @vals = @{ $Stack[-1]{vals} }[ 0, 1 ];
|
|
my @vars = ();
|
|
( $vars[0] = $var ) =~ s/\$FOO/ \$got/;
|
|
( $vars[1] = $var ) =~ s/\$FOO/\$expected/;
|
|
|
|
my $out = "Structures begin differing at:\n";
|
|
foreach my $idx ( 0 .. $#vals ) {
|
|
my $val = $vals[$idx];
|
|
$vals[$idx]
|
|
= !defined $val ? 'undef'
|
|
: _dne($val) ? "Does not exist"
|
|
: ref $val ? "$val"
|
|
: "'$val'";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
$out .= "$vars[0] = $vals[0]\n";
|
|
$out .= "$vars[1] = $vals[1]\n";
|
|
|
|
$out =~ s/^/ /msg;
|
|
return $out;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub _type {
|
|
my $thing = shift;
|
|
|
|
return '' if !ref $thing;
|
|
|
|
for my $type (qw(Regexp ARRAY HASH REF SCALAR GLOB CODE VSTRING)) {
|
|
return $type if UNIVERSAL::isa( $thing, $type );
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return '';
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head2 Diagnostics
|
|
|
|
If you pick the right test function, you'll usually get a good idea of
|
|
what went wrong when it failed. But sometimes it doesn't work out
|
|
that way. So here we have ways for you to write your own diagnostic
|
|
messages which are safer than just C<print STDERR>.
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item B<diag>
|
|
|
|
diag(@diagnostic_message);
|
|
|
|
Prints a diagnostic message which is guaranteed not to interfere with
|
|
test output. Like C<print> @diagnostic_message is simply concatenated
|
|
together.
|
|
|
|
Returns false, so as to preserve failure.
|
|
|
|
Handy for this sort of thing:
|
|
|
|
ok( grep(/foo/, @users), "There's a foo user" ) or
|
|
diag("Since there's no foo, check that /etc/bar is set up right");
|
|
|
|
which would produce:
|
|
|
|
not ok 42 - There's a foo user
|
|
# Failed test 'There's a foo user'
|
|
# in foo.t at line 52.
|
|
# Since there's no foo, check that /etc/bar is set up right.
|
|
|
|
You might remember C<ok() or diag()> with the mnemonic C<open() or
|
|
die()>.
|
|
|
|
B<NOTE> The exact formatting of the diagnostic output is still
|
|
changing, but it is guaranteed that whatever you throw at it won't
|
|
interfere with the test.
|
|
|
|
=item B<note>
|
|
|
|
note(@diagnostic_message);
|
|
|
|
Like C<diag()>, except the message will not be seen when the test is run
|
|
in a harness. It will only be visible in the verbose TAP stream.
|
|
|
|
Handy for putting in notes which might be useful for debugging, but
|
|
don't indicate a problem.
|
|
|
|
note("Tempfile is $tempfile");
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub diag {
|
|
return Test::More->builder->diag(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub note {
|
|
return Test::More->builder->note(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<explain>
|
|
|
|
my @dump = explain @diagnostic_message;
|
|
|
|
Will dump the contents of any references in a human readable format.
|
|
Usually you want to pass this into C<note> or C<diag>.
|
|
|
|
Handy for things like...
|
|
|
|
is_deeply($have, $want) || diag explain $have;
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
note explain \%args;
|
|
Some::Class->method(%args);
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub explain {
|
|
return Test::More->builder->explain(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head2 Conditional tests
|
|
|
|
Sometimes running a test under certain conditions will cause the
|
|
test script to die. A certain function or method isn't implemented
|
|
(such as C<fork()> on MacOS), some resource isn't available (like a
|
|
net connection) or a module isn't available. In these cases it's
|
|
necessary to skip tests, or declare that they are supposed to fail
|
|
but will work in the future (a todo test).
|
|
|
|
For more details on the mechanics of skip and todo tests see
|
|
L<Test::Harness>.
|
|
|
|
The way Test::More handles this is with a named block. Basically, a
|
|
block of tests which can be skipped over or made todo. It's best if I
|
|
just show you...
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item B<SKIP: BLOCK>
|
|
|
|
SKIP: {
|
|
skip $why, $how_many if $condition;
|
|
|
|
...normal testing code goes here...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
This declares a block of tests that might be skipped, $how_many tests
|
|
there are, $why and under what $condition to skip them. An example is
|
|
the easiest way to illustrate:
|
|
|
|
SKIP: {
|
|
eval { require HTML::Lint };
|
|
|
|
skip "HTML::Lint not installed", 2 if $@;
|
|
|
|
my $lint = new HTML::Lint;
|
|
isa_ok( $lint, "HTML::Lint" );
|
|
|
|
$lint->parse( $html );
|
|
is( $lint->errors, 0, "No errors found in HTML" );
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
If the user does not have HTML::Lint installed, the whole block of
|
|
code I<won't be run at all>. Test::More will output special ok's
|
|
which Test::Harness interprets as skipped, but passing, tests.
|
|
|
|
It's important that $how_many accurately reflects the number of tests
|
|
in the SKIP block so the # of tests run will match up with your plan.
|
|
If your plan is C<no_plan> $how_many is optional and will default to 1.
|
|
|
|
It's perfectly safe to nest SKIP blocks. Each SKIP block must have
|
|
the label C<SKIP>, or Test::More can't work its magic.
|
|
|
|
You don't skip tests which are failing because there's a bug in your
|
|
program, or for which you don't yet have code written. For that you
|
|
use TODO. Read on.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
## no critic (Subroutines::RequireFinalReturn)
|
|
sub skip {
|
|
my( $why, $how_many ) = @_;
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
# If the plan is set, and is static, then skip needs a count. If the plan
|
|
# is 'no_plan' we are fine. As well if plan is undefined then we are
|
|
# waiting for done_testing.
|
|
unless (defined $how_many) {
|
|
my $plan = $tb->has_plan;
|
|
_carp "skip() needs to know \$how_many tests are in the block"
|
|
if $plan && $plan =~ m/^\d+$/;
|
|
$how_many = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if( defined $how_many and $how_many =~ /\D/ ) {
|
|
_carp
|
|
"skip() was passed a non-numeric number of tests. Did you get the arguments backwards?";
|
|
$how_many = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for( 1 .. $how_many ) {
|
|
$tb->skip($why);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
no warnings 'exiting';
|
|
last SKIP;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<TODO: BLOCK>
|
|
|
|
TODO: {
|
|
local $TODO = $why if $condition;
|
|
|
|
...normal testing code goes here...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Declares a block of tests you expect to fail and $why. Perhaps it's
|
|
because you haven't fixed a bug or haven't finished a new feature:
|
|
|
|
TODO: {
|
|
local $TODO = "URI::Geller not finished";
|
|
|
|
my $card = "Eight of clubs";
|
|
is( URI::Geller->your_card, $card, 'Is THIS your card?' );
|
|
|
|
my $spoon;
|
|
URI::Geller->bend_spoon;
|
|
is( $spoon, 'bent', "Spoon bending, that's original" );
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
With a todo block, the tests inside are expected to fail. Test::More
|
|
will run the tests normally, but print out special flags indicating
|
|
they are "todo". L<Test::Harness> will interpret failures as being ok.
|
|
Should anything succeed, it will report it as an unexpected success.
|
|
You then know the thing you had todo is done and can remove the
|
|
TODO flag.
|
|
|
|
The nice part about todo tests, as opposed to simply commenting out a
|
|
block of tests, is that it is like having a programmatic todo list. You know
|
|
how much work is left to be done, you're aware of what bugs there are,
|
|
and you'll know immediately when they're fixed.
|
|
|
|
Once a todo test starts succeeding, simply move it outside the block.
|
|
When the block is empty, delete it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item B<todo_skip>
|
|
|
|
TODO: {
|
|
todo_skip $why, $how_many if $condition;
|
|
|
|
...normal testing code...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
With todo tests, it's best to have the tests actually run. That way
|
|
you'll know when they start passing. Sometimes this isn't possible.
|
|
Often a failing test will cause the whole program to die or hang, even
|
|
inside an C<eval BLOCK> with and using C<alarm>. In these extreme
|
|
cases you have no choice but to skip over the broken tests entirely.
|
|
|
|
The syntax and behavior is similar to a C<SKIP: BLOCK> except the
|
|
tests will be marked as failing but todo. L<Test::Harness> will
|
|
interpret them as passing.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub todo_skip {
|
|
my( $why, $how_many ) = @_;
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
unless( defined $how_many ) {
|
|
# $how_many can only be avoided when no_plan is in use.
|
|
_carp "todo_skip() needs to know \$how_many tests are in the block"
|
|
unless $tb->has_plan eq 'no_plan';
|
|
$how_many = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for( 1 .. $how_many ) {
|
|
$tb->todo_skip($why);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
no warnings 'exiting';
|
|
last TODO;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item When do I use SKIP vs. TODO?
|
|
|
|
B<If it's something the user might not be able to do>, use SKIP.
|
|
This includes optional modules that aren't installed, running under
|
|
an OS that doesn't have some feature (like C<fork()> or symlinks), or maybe
|
|
you need an Internet connection and one isn't available.
|
|
|
|
B<If it's something the programmer hasn't done yet>, use TODO. This
|
|
is for any code you haven't written yet, or bugs you have yet to fix,
|
|
but want to put tests in your testing script (always a good idea).
|
|
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head2 Test control
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item B<BAIL_OUT>
|
|
|
|
BAIL_OUT($reason);
|
|
|
|
Indicates to the harness that things are going so badly all testing
|
|
should terminate. This includes the running of any additional test scripts.
|
|
|
|
This is typically used when testing cannot continue such as a critical
|
|
module failing to compile or a necessary external utility not being
|
|
available such as a database connection failing.
|
|
|
|
The test will exit with 255.
|
|
|
|
For even better control look at L<Test::Most>.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub BAIL_OUT {
|
|
my $reason = shift;
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
$tb->BAIL_OUT($reason);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head2 Discouraged comparison functions
|
|
|
|
The use of the following functions is discouraged as they are not
|
|
actually testing functions and produce no diagnostics to help figure
|
|
out what went wrong. They were written before C<is_deeply()> existed
|
|
because I couldn't figure out how to display a useful diff of two
|
|
arbitrary data structures.
|
|
|
|
These functions are usually used inside an C<ok()>.
|
|
|
|
ok( eq_array(\@got, \@expected) );
|
|
|
|
C<is_deeply()> can do that better and with diagnostics.
|
|
|
|
is_deeply( \@got, \@expected );
|
|
|
|
They may be deprecated in future versions.
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item B<eq_array>
|
|
|
|
my $is_eq = eq_array(\@got, \@expected);
|
|
|
|
Checks if two arrays are equivalent. This is a deep check, so
|
|
multi-level structures are handled correctly.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
#'#
|
|
sub eq_array {
|
|
local @Data_Stack = ();
|
|
_deep_check(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub _eq_array {
|
|
my( $a1, $a2 ) = @_;
|
|
|
|
if( grep _type($_) ne 'ARRAY', $a1, $a2 ) {
|
|
warn "eq_array passed a non-array ref";
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 1 if $a1 eq $a2;
|
|
|
|
my $ok = 1;
|
|
my $max = $#$a1 > $#$a2 ? $#$a1 : $#$a2;
|
|
for( 0 .. $max ) {
|
|
my $e1 = $_ > $#$a1 ? $DNE : $a1->[$_];
|
|
my $e2 = $_ > $#$a2 ? $DNE : $a2->[$_];
|
|
|
|
next if _equal_nonrefs($e1, $e2);
|
|
|
|
push @Data_Stack, { type => 'ARRAY', idx => $_, vals => [ $e1, $e2 ] };
|
|
$ok = _deep_check( $e1, $e2 );
|
|
pop @Data_Stack if $ok;
|
|
|
|
last unless $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub _equal_nonrefs {
|
|
my( $e1, $e2 ) = @_;
|
|
|
|
return if ref $e1 or ref $e2;
|
|
|
|
if ( defined $e1 ) {
|
|
return 1 if defined $e2 and $e1 eq $e2;
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
return 1 if !defined $e2;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub _deep_check {
|
|
my( $e1, $e2 ) = @_;
|
|
my $tb = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
my $ok = 0;
|
|
|
|
# Effectively turn %Refs_Seen into a stack. This avoids picking up
|
|
# the same referenced used twice (such as [\$a, \$a]) to be considered
|
|
# circular.
|
|
local %Refs_Seen = %Refs_Seen;
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
$tb->_unoverload_str( \$e1, \$e2 );
|
|
|
|
# Either they're both references or both not.
|
|
my $same_ref = !( !ref $e1 xor !ref $e2 );
|
|
my $not_ref = ( !ref $e1 and !ref $e2 );
|
|
|
|
if( defined $e1 xor defined $e2 ) {
|
|
$ok = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( !defined $e1 and !defined $e2 ) {
|
|
# Shortcut if they're both undefined.
|
|
$ok = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( _dne($e1) xor _dne($e2) ) {
|
|
$ok = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( $same_ref and( $e1 eq $e2 ) ) {
|
|
$ok = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
elsif($not_ref) {
|
|
push @Data_Stack, { type => '', vals => [ $e1, $e2 ] };
|
|
$ok = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
if( $Refs_Seen{$e1} ) {
|
|
return $Refs_Seen{$e1} eq $e2;
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
$Refs_Seen{$e1} = "$e2";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
my $type = _type($e1);
|
|
$type = 'DIFFERENT' unless _type($e2) eq $type;
|
|
|
|
if( $type eq 'DIFFERENT' ) {
|
|
push @Data_Stack, { type => $type, vals => [ $e1, $e2 ] };
|
|
$ok = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( $type eq 'ARRAY' ) {
|
|
$ok = _eq_array( $e1, $e2 );
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( $type eq 'HASH' ) {
|
|
$ok = _eq_hash( $e1, $e2 );
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( $type eq 'REF' ) {
|
|
push @Data_Stack, { type => $type, vals => [ $e1, $e2 ] };
|
|
$ok = _deep_check( $$e1, $$e2 );
|
|
pop @Data_Stack if $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
elsif( $type eq 'SCALAR' ) {
|
|
push @Data_Stack, { type => 'REF', vals => [ $e1, $e2 ] };
|
|
$ok = _deep_check( $$e1, $$e2 );
|
|
pop @Data_Stack if $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
elsif($type) {
|
|
push @Data_Stack, { type => $type, vals => [ $e1, $e2 ] };
|
|
$ok = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
_whoa( 1, "No type in _deep_check" );
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub _whoa {
|
|
my( $check, $desc ) = @_;
|
|
if($check) {
|
|
die <<"WHOA";
|
|
WHOA! $desc
|
|
This should never happen! Please contact the author immediately!
|
|
WHOA
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<eq_hash>
|
|
|
|
my $is_eq = eq_hash(\%got, \%expected);
|
|
|
|
Determines if the two hashes contain the same keys and values. This
|
|
is a deep check.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub eq_hash {
|
|
local @Data_Stack = ();
|
|
return _deep_check(@_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub _eq_hash {
|
|
my( $a1, $a2 ) = @_;
|
|
|
|
if( grep _type($_) ne 'HASH', $a1, $a2 ) {
|
|
warn "eq_hash passed a non-hash ref";
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 1 if $a1 eq $a2;
|
|
|
|
my $ok = 1;
|
|
my $bigger = keys %$a1 > keys %$a2 ? $a1 : $a2;
|
|
foreach my $k ( keys %$bigger ) {
|
|
my $e1 = exists $a1->{$k} ? $a1->{$k} : $DNE;
|
|
my $e2 = exists $a2->{$k} ? $a2->{$k} : $DNE;
|
|
|
|
next if _equal_nonrefs($e1, $e2);
|
|
|
|
push @Data_Stack, { type => 'HASH', idx => $k, vals => [ $e1, $e2 ] };
|
|
$ok = _deep_check( $e1, $e2 );
|
|
pop @Data_Stack if $ok;
|
|
|
|
last unless $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return $ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=item B<eq_set>
|
|
|
|
my $is_eq = eq_set(\@got, \@expected);
|
|
|
|
Similar to C<eq_array()>, except the order of the elements is B<not>
|
|
important. This is a deep check, but the irrelevancy of order only
|
|
applies to the top level.
|
|
|
|
ok( eq_set(\@got, \@expected) );
|
|
|
|
Is better written:
|
|
|
|
is_deeply( [sort @got], [sort @expected] );
|
|
|
|
B<NOTE> By historical accident, this is not a true set comparison.
|
|
While the order of elements does not matter, duplicate elements do.
|
|
|
|
B<NOTE> C<eq_set()> does not know how to deal with references at the top
|
|
level. The following is an example of a comparison which might not work:
|
|
|
|
eq_set([\1, \2], [\2, \1]);
|
|
|
|
L<Test::Deep> contains much better set comparison functions.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
sub eq_set {
|
|
my( $a1, $a2 ) = @_;
|
|
return 0 unless @$a1 == @$a2;
|
|
|
|
no warnings 'uninitialized';
|
|
|
|
# It really doesn't matter how we sort them, as long as both arrays are
|
|
# sorted with the same algorithm.
|
|
#
|
|
# Ensure that references are not accidentally treated the same as a
|
|
# string containing the reference.
|
|
#
|
|
# Have to inline the sort routine due to a threading/sort bug.
|
|
# See [rt.cpan.org 6782]
|
|
#
|
|
# I don't know how references would be sorted so we just don't sort
|
|
# them. This means eq_set doesn't really work with refs.
|
|
return eq_array(
|
|
[ grep( ref, @$a1 ), sort( grep( !ref, @$a1 ) ) ],
|
|
[ grep( ref, @$a2 ), sort( grep( !ref, @$a2 ) ) ],
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head2 Extending and Embedding Test::More
|
|
|
|
Sometimes the Test::More interface isn't quite enough. Fortunately,
|
|
Test::More is built on top of L<Test::Builder> which provides a single,
|
|
unified backend for any test library to use. This means two test
|
|
libraries which both use <Test::Builder> B<can> be used together in the
|
|
same program>.
|
|
|
|
If you simply want to do a little tweaking of how the tests behave,
|
|
you can access the underlying L<Test::Builder> object like so:
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item B<builder>
|
|
|
|
my $test_builder = Test::More->builder;
|
|
|
|
Returns the L<Test::Builder> object underlying Test::More for you to play
|
|
with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 EXIT CODES
|
|
|
|
If all your tests passed, L<Test::Builder> will exit with zero (which is
|
|
normal). If anything failed it will exit with how many failed. If
|
|
you run less (or more) tests than you planned, the missing (or extras)
|
|
will be considered failures. If no tests were ever run L<Test::Builder>
|
|
will throw a warning and exit with 255. If the test died, even after
|
|
having successfully completed all its tests, it will still be
|
|
considered a failure and will exit with 255.
|
|
|
|
So the exit codes are...
|
|
|
|
0 all tests successful
|
|
255 test died or all passed but wrong # of tests run
|
|
any other number how many failed (including missing or extras)
|
|
|
|
If you fail more than 254 tests, it will be reported as 254.
|
|
|
|
B<NOTE> This behavior may go away in future versions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 COMPATIBILITY
|
|
|
|
Test::More works with Perls as old as 5.8.1.
|
|
|
|
Thread support is not very reliable before 5.10.1, but that's
|
|
because threads are not very reliable before 5.10.1.
|
|
|
|
Although Test::More has been a core module in versions of Perl since 5.6.2, Test::More has evolved since then, and not all of the features you're used to will be present in the shipped version of Test::More. If you are writing a module, don't forget to indicate in your package metadata the minimum version of Test::More that you require. For instance, if you want to use C<done_testing()> but want your test script to run on Perl 5.10.0, you will need to explicitly require Test::More > 0.88.
|
|
|
|
Key feature milestones include:
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item subtests
|
|
|
|
Subtests were released in Test::More 0.94, which came with Perl 5.12.0. Subtests did not implicitly call C<done_testing()> until 0.96; the first Perl with that fix was Perl 5.14.0 with 0.98.
|
|
|
|
=item C<done_testing()>
|
|
|
|
This was released in Test::More 0.88 and first shipped with Perl in 5.10.1 as part of Test::More 0.92.
|
|
|
|
=item C<cmp_ok()>
|
|
|
|
Although C<cmp_ok()> was introduced in 0.40, 0.86 fixed an important bug to make it safe for overloaded objects; the fixed first shipped with Perl in 5.10.1 as part of Test::More 0.92.
|
|
|
|
=item C<new_ok()> C<note()> and C<explain()>
|
|
|
|
These were was released in Test::More 0.82, and first shipped with Perl in 5.10.1 as part of Test::More 0.92.
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
There is a full version history in the Changes file, and the Test::More versions included as core can be found using L<Module::CoreList>:
|
|
|
|
$ corelist -a Test::More
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 CAVEATS and NOTES
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item utf8 / "Wide character in print"
|
|
|
|
If you use utf8 or other non-ASCII characters with Test::More you
|
|
might get a "Wide character in print" warning. Using
|
|
C<< binmode STDOUT, ":utf8" >> will not fix it.
|
|
L<Test::Builder> (which powers
|
|
Test::More) duplicates STDOUT and STDERR. So any changes to them,
|
|
including changing their output disciplines, will not be seen by
|
|
Test::More.
|
|
|
|
One work around is to apply encodings to STDOUT and STDERR as early
|
|
as possible and before Test::More (or any other Test module) loads.
|
|
|
|
use open ':std', ':encoding(utf8)';
|
|
use Test::More;
|
|
|
|
A more direct work around is to change the filehandles used by
|
|
L<Test::Builder>.
|
|
|
|
my $builder = Test::More->builder;
|
|
binmode $builder->output, ":encoding(utf8)";
|
|
binmode $builder->failure_output, ":encoding(utf8)";
|
|
binmode $builder->todo_output, ":encoding(utf8)";
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item Overloaded objects
|
|
|
|
String overloaded objects are compared B<as strings> (or in C<cmp_ok()>'s
|
|
case, strings or numbers as appropriate to the comparison op). This
|
|
prevents Test::More from piercing an object's interface allowing
|
|
better blackbox testing. So if a function starts returning overloaded
|
|
objects instead of bare strings your tests won't notice the
|
|
difference. This is good.
|
|
|
|
However, it does mean that functions like C<is_deeply()> cannot be used to
|
|
test the internals of string overloaded objects. In this case I would
|
|
suggest L<Test::Deep> which contains more flexible testing functions for
|
|
complex data structures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item Threads
|
|
|
|
Test::More will only be aware of threads if C<use threads> has been done
|
|
I<before> Test::More is loaded. This is ok:
|
|
|
|
use threads;
|
|
use Test::More;
|
|
|
|
This may cause problems:
|
|
|
|
use Test::More
|
|
use threads;
|
|
|
|
5.8.1 and above are supported. Anything below that has too many bugs.
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 HISTORY
|
|
|
|
This is a case of convergent evolution with Joshua Pritikin's L<Test>
|
|
module. I was largely unaware of its existence when I'd first
|
|
written my own C<ok()> routines. This module exists because I can't
|
|
figure out how to easily wedge test names into Test's interface (along
|
|
with a few other problems).
|
|
|
|
The goal here is to have a testing utility that's simple to learn,
|
|
quick to use and difficult to trip yourself up with while still
|
|
providing more flexibility than the existing Test.pm. As such, the
|
|
names of the most common routines are kept tiny, special cases and
|
|
magic side-effects are kept to a minimum. WYSIWYG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 SEE ALSO
|
|
|
|
=head2
|
|
|
|
=head2 ALTERNATIVES
|
|
|
|
L<Test2::Suite> is the most recent and modern set of tools for testing.
|
|
|
|
L<Test::Simple> if all this confuses you and you just want to write
|
|
some tests. You can upgrade to Test::More later (it's forward
|
|
compatible).
|
|
|
|
L<Test::Legacy> tests written with Test.pm, the original testing
|
|
module, do not play well with other testing libraries. Test::Legacy
|
|
emulates the Test.pm interface and does play well with others.
|
|
|
|
=head2 ADDITIONAL LIBRARIES
|
|
|
|
L<Test::Differences> for more ways to test complex data structures.
|
|
And it plays well with Test::More.
|
|
|
|
L<Test::Class> is like xUnit but more perlish.
|
|
|
|
L<Test::Deep> gives you more powerful complex data structure testing.
|
|
|
|
L<Test::Inline> shows the idea of embedded testing.
|
|
|
|
L<Mock::Quick> The ultimate mocking library. Easily spawn objects defined on
|
|
the fly. Can also override, block, or reimplement packages as needed.
|
|
|
|
L<Test::FixtureBuilder> Quickly define fixture data for unit tests.
|
|
|
|
=head2 OTHER COMPONENTS
|
|
|
|
L<Test::Harness> is the test runner and output interpreter for Perl.
|
|
It's the thing that powers C<make test> and where the C<prove> utility
|
|
comes from.
|
|
|
|
=head2 BUNDLES
|
|
|
|
L<Test::Most> Most commonly needed test functions and features.
|
|
|
|
=head1 AUTHORS
|
|
|
|
Michael G Schwern E<lt>schwern@pobox.comE<gt> with much inspiration
|
|
from Joshua Pritikin's Test module and lots of help from Barrie
|
|
Slaymaker, Tony Bowden, blackstar.co.uk, chromatic, Fergal Daly and
|
|
the perl-qa gang.
|
|
|
|
=head1 MAINTAINERS
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item Chad Granum E<lt>exodist@cpan.orgE<gt>
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 BUGS
|
|
|
|
See F<https://github.com/Test-More/test-more/issues> to report and view bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 SOURCE
|
|
|
|
The source code repository for Test::More can be found at
|
|
F<http://github.com/Test-More/test-more/>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 COPYRIGHT
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2001-2008 by Michael G Schwern E<lt>schwern@pobox.comE<gt>.
|
|
|
|
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|
modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.
|
|
|
|
See F<http://www.perl.com/perl/misc/Artistic.html>
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
1;
|